id
stringlengths 36
36
| text
stringlengths 1
400
| source
stringclasses 604
values |
|---|---|---|
163a2e4d-7e70-4863-b7e0-b640d8806ab8
|
. If the appellant thinks that she is not bound by the decree, she will have to advise h erself on what lawful action she should take. There is no necessity to go into the merits of the matter in this appeal filed against the dismissal of the revision application
|
sc_appeal_190_2011_ed.txt
|
2930497a-8c5a-4334-9c10-b2ecd9d68ec8
|
. This court had granted leave to appeal mainly on the question whether the High Court failed to consider that there was no proper substitution in the room of the deceased 1st defendant when the case was taken up for ex parte trial against the 1st defendant
|
sc_appeal_190_2011_ed.txt
|
df7d6595-0f91-4a35-a993-5f0802039cfe
|
. I answer that question in the negative because there was no necessity for the High Court to deal with that matter when the appeal was pending
|
sc_appeal_190_2011_ed.txt
|
8452ed82-3708-423d-ad86-f674936ca113
|
. I affirm the judgment of the High Court on the basis that there was no justification for entertaining the belated revision application filed against the order of the District Court, especially when the appeal , according to the appellant herself, was pending in the same court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed but without costs. Judge of the Supreme Court 5 SC/APPEAL/190/2011 E.A.G.R
|
sc_appeal_190_2011_ed.txt
|
f41c9577-02d3-4771-b5c1-753a3b5c9ea4
|
. Amarasekara, J. I agree. Judge of the Supreme Court Kumudini Wickremasinghe , J. I agree. Judge of the Supreme Court
|
sc_appeal_190_2011_ed.txt
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.